Politically speaking. Trying to think of some better way to represent the views of a politicians constituents. For example say a man say hes me ran for office of some kind any kind on the platform that he would follow quite strictly the platform of voting on issues based on the will of the people that he represents. These people of course being his constituents. Now suggesting this we'd of course need some method of communication that all members are comfortable with. Perhaps the internet. But the point by point method of internet dialouge seems so imperfect. The beauty of the internet seems that it gives fair and level playing field to all people. No certain person or certain people are better off online than precisely those that are capable of presenting a point in a clear and concise manner. Votes up or down can be an indicator for quality...but an automatic mediator of some sort, some computer algorithm that sorts the comments based on their content is needed. Grouping of similar ideas or concepts. Back to the original idea. I run on a ticket to represent the political agenda of the majority of the citizens of the area that I represent, my own opinions or beliefs be damned. Would this work? Why this guy some (many) may say. Quick interjection I'd also like to develop a more perfect touch pad, keyboard etc because this mono-graphic plain keyboard situation is seriously flawed. Why can't an on screen keyboard be more interactive, almost topical in a way? Probably because it needs to be able to switch back to a screen at a moments notice. Hmm. We the people, in order to form a more perfect keypad, do hereby set out to develop and incorporate an interactive keyboard that has better recognition of which keys I meant to type. Anyway. This candidate would need to gather the info from his peeps on a regular basis . Each vote would need to be explained to them. They vote yay or nay. Whichever side wins is how I vote. I don't know there seems to be a flaw I'm overlooking. It'd be nice if every registered voter in an area could be able to cast their vote on every issue. Not sure how often votes are done or how. But boy is my writing terrible. Never was a good writer. I simply refused to take the advice of.my teachers. Have never even cared to even think about bothering with the classical and probably already proven to be effective methods of writing, like I wanted to do it my own way. Just because. Oh well. That aside this whole thing s got me.thinking that every flicking measure that has passed or failed has done so because some group of people has voted either yes or no and.those votes were counted and the majority winner was declared. Which seems so crazy. That something so simple (yes or no) could detemine the outcome of.so many various things. Like a guilty verdict for example. Tons of people have probably been put to death over a 5-4 vote (or something like that) but I guess at least they were given a trial of some.sort. aye. Back to the drawing board, need to rethink my inks (move quotes).
