Monday, December 21, 2009
it would make sense
[we interrupt this segment, to say that it might profit from making an album with a band, whose debut album and band name was the opposite of another band name and debut album. it would be an interesting twist to the music industry. and of course launch it online. so much i'd like to do but just need parent's support, financially]
yes, it would make sense if...
to insert an introduction to one's article.
to whom it may concern (myself primarily),
let us focus on the matter of sense, and whether or not anything warrants it. it would make sense if people wouldn't kill each other in the middle east due to a religion or worldview. granted much fighting has been called by this country (the US) but still a lot of killing is done. it would make sense if this were to end. and yet it would make sense for it to continue, to go on. for someone has to die either way. someone's always dying. the US erecting a 20 ft. high fence across 2,000 miles of border. follow the laws. of the world. they're the only legal jurisdiction there is, and it's the only words that can truly hurt you. by sitting your ass in jail. intentionally. the death penalty is a hell of a threat. but it needs to be told to the people who risk killing somebody. billboards. no we gotta do more than billboards. a whole national campaign; an international campaign, to show the dangers of committing murder. maybe the rate would go down; maybe the cost of living would go up; but ideally, people would become smarter, and smartness yields, well, not the same conclusion every time. different people yield different results. it's a race for cultural supremacy. choych this blows. peace.
Saturday, December 12, 2009
woke up dreaming
no i didn't, i actually woke up dreaming i'd just fallen 30 feet from a kite (which somehow held my weight) pulled by a dog (what?) ridden by chrissy (hold up) after she took a turn too wide and got trampled by some horses. makes absolutely no sense. what does make sense is that the soundtrack to my descent, landing and subsequent sitting up and examining of my injuries was "ooh whatcha saaaaaaay, ohhwhahaeahhhhha did she saaayyyaay/ooh whathca ssaaaaayy" the song by imogen heap, hide and seek it turns out to be. makes sense after the snl skit i suppose.
went for a walk today, testing my knees, i can still jump and climb a bit, but i am anxious to get to a city compatible w/ free-running instead of nearly-free-walking.
watching blow and my golly johnny depp cracks me up just the facial expressions and everything, one of the best. peace.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
but first
ok, I've just talked to 3 different offices and people:
prosecution office of wabash, indiana
probation office of wabash, indiana
jpmorgan chase credit card
and at all three fucking places, the women telephone answerers were snippy with me. my question is, WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR JOB, BITCH? isn't it to answer phones, make appointments, suck a dick from time to time? oh wait, no, if you'd sucked a dick you wouldn't be answering fucking phones you stupid cunts.
i know that sounds harsh, but when I call someplace with a few measly questions, don't act like your time is so important that I'm disrupting the fucking state of the union address or something. I understand "days of our lives" is on and you're trying watching it online and you're on your period, but shape up and be polite, courteous, and answer my fucking questions like it was the best damn thing you could be doing at that moment.
then again, I'm not the one stuck doing that shit, so maybe it really is that bad.
Friday, November 27, 2009
why
a stupid question i propose, and hopefully can show.
i'll start with "why".
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
random
the reason for my writing: i recently (within the last few weeks) visually consumed all the episodes of sacha baron cohen's hbo comedy half-hour 'da ali g show', to my personal enjoyment. granted he plays the fool, the buffoon, the idiot, the child, but it's this simplistic approach to adults and so called experts that makes the show what it is. that established, i watched borat 2 1/2 summers ago and found it obscure but entertaining; it's rare nowadays to find someone who pushes the lines that blatantly and gets away with it. i did not however find much sympathy with people who tried to quote the character without knowing anything about the show, and often ignored good-natured attempts at a 'high five'. it's difficult to distinguish between being an ass and maintaining some standard of what's funny and what's not allowable.
either way, i just now watched 'bruno' and 'ali g in da house' and my conclusion is that the triptych of these three characters is something that's never been done before by any actor. he created them, made them ridiculous (though very similar in their child-like characteristics) and then made them movies. now he can retire them and move to three other characters, or whatever he wants to do. it did feel like if he'd left the characters as crazy as they were in the show, the movies would have been better. in 'da ali g' show each one was an odd ball but not through the roof like the movies were. it was pushed to an unbelievable limit in the films, and would have been so much better if left as they appeared in the show.
sorry denmark-usa just came on and a bowl of spaghetti w/ buttered bread and i'd rather indulge the direct gratification senses than think. i am an american, leave me be. ha. peace
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
i'm going to start typing
this is enlightening and i am encouraged by my ability to write a few lines at a time like this. it is odd how sometimes we - i generalize, this occurs to me but mayn't occur to others - how sometimes i don't know how i feel or what i think about a topic or something until i open my mouth to talk about it. like the ideas were formed prior in my head or in my unconsciousness somewhere and only spilled out by accident. or not. not accident that is. it seems like the same thing occurs whilst writing. ooh i want to put down this single thought, but i'll put it in the proper context for myself (this is assuming i'm the only one who will read this, which is probably accurate):
from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Micah Robert Lahman Sollenberger is a homo sapien and American citizen born January 15 1987 in Harrisburg Pennsylvania to his parents. He is 6'1" and currently weighs 160 pounds. He has one older brother and one younger sister and is of a long family line of Christian believing, church going, well-respected pacifist Brethren. While he would admit his upbringing has been "superb", he is sometimes frustrated with the general lack of certainty in this life and the frustrations everyday existence bring.
He studied Philosophy at Manchester College, a time he calls "academically and socially harrowing, though I love the fact that I got to spend 4 and a half years with my maternal grandparents and various Lahman relatives". He is currently writing up a pseudo-Wikipedia article on his blogger account. His future remains unseen, though he plans on dying in the year 2077(!).
haha you get the point. what i'm trying to say is that i frequently read my life like a wikipedia article, to curious ends. like which external links will the reader click? will the "Sollenbergers" have made a name for themselves yet? will I have made a name for myself yet? will I have realized that this is futile yet? I want to do something though. except that no one does that. just do what you do.
peace.
Monday, October 12, 2009
lots
watched the phillies clinch the alds, which means i'll be watching them for another week. sports are a funny thing, but ultimately they are just games and can't be held in serious discussion. i'm working on breaking that trance as well. need to grow up and take the bull by the horns. I'd rather take the flower by the stem and just, you know, get married. work something something, live somewhere. don't care. done caring. but never will be. ready to face the charges.
man this emotional over 3 misdemeanors and 1 felony, i can't imagine facing something forreal. FA-REAL! passed that stage too.
Fringe Science
Philosophy of Science
Fringe Science: 10/7/08
Micah Sollenberger
While the field of study I have chosen doesn’t have a name just yet, I’m quite confident that in the next one hundred and fifty years or so it will be able to step out of the realm of fringe science and into the world of scientific truth. This area of study is often ridiculed and occasionally “debunked”, but it never seems to be fully explained away. Conspiracy theories are labeled as such by the people accused of manipulating money, government, the mass media and therefore the masses and so instead I will call this study the study of alternative truths.
Now, you might wonder how the study of alternative truths can be anything but an oxymoron given the nature of alternative and the nature of truth, inherently understood as that which is not false. But unfortunately, since the beginning of time, human beings have been manipulating the situations they exist in to better provide for food or water or security or whatever will help them survive longer. Therefore, since the beginning of time there has been what actually happened and what was recorded as having happened. Sometimes these two coincide, and sometimes they don’t.
This leads me to some theories of the study of alternative truths: first, there exists a loosely knit group of ruling elite, many of which bounce between high-level corporate and governmental positions, as well as many non-governmental organizations. These non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) were created by them to pursue an agenda based on the advancement of their own, or others like them. Secondly, this group has been controlling the money supply for almost one hundred years, and similar others have been sitting on billions of dollars since the 1930’s, leaving little doubt that a proactive and focused attempt to infiltrate world politics was impossible.
Thirdly, finding themselves capable of manipulating money (the Great Depression), government (World Bank, IMF, countless interventions in Latin America) and the mass media (read, corporate media), this group has taken every possible opportunity to profit from war, poverty and misery on just about every level of the global stage, due mostly to the trickle down effect of loss, as nobody is willing to suffer greatly so that others may lose less, and conversely nobody is going to give up more so that others may gain little. This has been going on for decades.
Fourthly, it is still going on as we speak. Everything from HIV/AIDS to the “terrorist” bombings of the U.S.S. Cole and 9/11 to the current financial crisis has been pre-determined and carried out in order to pass laws that constrict the rights of U.S. citizens, allow for funding of astronomical proportions (U.S. Defense budget was $500+ billion this/last year) and control populations. Furthermore, “terrorism” is a fabricated illusion of all of our imaginations, planted by those who are in charge of the truths we are told, tended by those that want us to fear one another and watered by those “quo bono”; who benefit.
To asses said claims, allow us to look at the facts; the empirical evidence. There is countless evidence that those in charge of what we understand to be true are withholding some information. The FBI and the CIA both contain more information than I will ever know.
Explanatory power: these claims explain every conceivable suspicious activity that has occurred ever since the Great Depression. They all tie into one main problem and offer one main conclusion for everything. Therefore it has terrific predictive power, as multiple people foresaw the events of September 11 2001 (Aaron Russou, for example).
As far as in-breadth explanatory power is concerned, this one covers them all.
In depth explanatory power: we only know so far as inside agents have been willing to dispose; due to the wickedness of those running the show, most people who spill any beans wind up dead within a few years.
In conclusion, the degree to which this is a good empirical science and whether it should remain a fringe science is tough to tell, mainly because of the conflicting stories between what we are told and what we are able to find out on our own, separately. There are few experiments to run and any conclusions that are contradictory to the official stories are hard to believe, as most people rationalized internally how they wanted to understand and accept as fact what they witnessed in each given circumstance. The truth of the matter is unknown to most of us, but until someone figures out a solution we will continue to be at the whim of the events of the day, regardless of whether or not some group of someone’s is running the world.
Friday, October 9, 2009
Danny Devito Kills It: Always Sunny
Danny DeVito is absolutely killing it in the new episode of It's Always Sunny, you're favorite show on FX about the classic gang of Philly's finest bar, Paddy's Pub. So far he's been a drunken bumbling garbling hobo trying to bang his sister-in-law at her husbands funeral, with an absolutely brilliant display of drunkenness on the streets walking Philadelphia suburbs with Mac. Meanwhile the psychological siblings continue to embarrass and harass various people, bringing Charlie into the mix in an attempt to stabilize Frank, hilariously portrayed by Mr. DeVito himself. More to follow..
{hahaha Charlie intervenes on Dennis and Dee due to a drinking problem, which of all else is drinking wine out of a can, which is, by the way, 'brilliant!'.}
"we're gonna get all in your face and point out your faults.."
"a roast? I've always wanted to be roasted. oh wait let me just switch gears here, fire up this spliff!"
- hahaha best line of the episode
amazing 5th episode, in some ways i'm glad i missed it and downloaded it tonight to watch it, it went perfect with the final episode of season one.
peace, love to all sunny fans, and
unity and justice for all philly fans.
go phillies!
b
Thursday, October 8, 2009
thursday
i've chosen atheism, or new-atheism for my research topic for the senior seminar and hope to come to some neat conclusions. the first article we read mentions belief as an alternative to doubt if only to give someone something to live for. personally, i feel like believing in god is just as silly as saying that god doesn't exist, which i suppose leaves agnosticism as the default category, but i believe in the idea of god. the idea of god is a powerful and seductive mindset for we humans, and i think it's a tossup as to whether it's been more constructive or destructive over the course of human existence.
speaking of, i signed up for twitter, weheartit, re-signed up for facebook, and am actively blogging on this homo site, so we'll see what that means.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
soooo
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
where i'm at
Sunday, May 17, 2009
what
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
from such
seething seeing superior topics as these certain things.
question:
Friday, May 1, 2009
adult content
i believe in astrology, and that it is the foundation for all of today's religions. therefore, any reference to beliefs or "information" prior to the discovery of the actual size of our universe i deem irrelevant. excepting of course the actual study of astrology, which is still relevant (and everything based on astrology, which actually contradicts my previous statement, but i guess i'll clarify it to "belief claims ignorant to the truth of its origins" as what i claim irrelevant, but even this leads to obvious contraditions, in which case i stand by neither statement) though actually not. ha!
fuck, shit, bitch, piss, ass, dick, pussy, gay, fag, dyke, clown, retard - these are the first swear words which came to my mind, and though i'm not against screening their usage (i used to be terrified to utter even one in a sentence, and received a "time out" for using the first one in reference to a puzzle which i couldn't finish) i do believe they lead to simplified and unspecific verbiage in general.
if god is dead, then i am the second coming of jesus. this statement clearly has potententially offensive implications, but my screen just broke nooooooo ok bye.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
test
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
2.1 and 4/28/2009.1
further, i will not re-read posts before posting them, but rather will maintain a stream-of-consciousness-like writing style, which usually works for me. hopefully my brain hasn't been shot by hours of stumble!-ing and blastesd fantasy baseball (and fantasy other things) to the point where i can't construct a well pointed sentence which has some consistency throughout. thank you.
micah.
2
i wonder if i can make this non-public.
4/28/2009
micah.