test

i have an exam right now, soon that is, at 6:30 pm eastern time, my second to last one for 20th century philosophy, and the test is on Husserl, Heidegger and Sarte. i'd just like to get a few words out so as to prepare getting my thoughts down efficiently and effectively. that's not to say that that will help me regarding the information i need to know, but maybe it will allow me to write easier. i was studying and looking up answers and everything, but got distracted. it's very easy to do on the internet if you haven't noticed. i have. so husserl was different from heidegger but i don't know how. or, that is, i do know how. when that pencil starts moving, you need to stay positivie. you do know this, or at least you can pretend like you do. reality is a lot of creating illusions to convince yourself that certain things are not like they are. but is this how it has to be? i mean, i've been told recently quite a few times that "college is what you make it", like i'm free to interpret everything one way or another. this seems faulty, i'll try and touch on this later. for now though, let's assume that the world as we experience it is indeed one way or the other, or another, or almost infinite different ways. so if every second is every possible possibility, then life is like, 1/infinity, because usually you can only pick one way to go. is this what leibniz meant? i think so, now that makes sense.